Liquid Glass represents more than an aesthetic update or surface-level polish. It functions as a complex behavioral system, precisely engineered to dictate how interface layers react to user input. In practical terms, this means Apple devices now interact with interface surfaces not as static, interchangeable panes, but as dynamic, adaptive materials that fluidly flex and respond to every interaction. Interface elements now behave like physical materials with depth and transparency, creating subtle visual distortions in content beneath them, like looking through textured glass.

Designer: Apple

This comprehensive redesign permeates every pixel across the entire Apple ecosystem, encompassing iOS, iPadOS, macOS, and watchOS, creating consistent experience regardless of platform. Born out of close collaboration between Apple’s design and engineering teams, Liquid Glass uses real-time rendering and dynamically reacts to movement with specular highlights. The system extends from the smallest interface elements (buttons, switches, sliders, text controls, media controls) to larger components including tab bars and sidebars. What began as experimental explorations within visionOS has evolved into a foundational cornerstone across all of Apple’s platforms.

Yanko Design (Vincent Nguyen): What was that initial simple idea that sparked Liquid Glass? And second, how would you describe the concept of “material” in this context to everyday users who don’t understand design?

Alan Dye (VP of Human Interface Design, Apple): “Well, two things. I think what got us mostly excited was the idea of whether we could create a digital material that could morph and adapt and change in place, and still have this beautiful transparency so it could show through to the content. Because I think, initially, our goal is always to celebrate the user’s content, whether that’s media or the app.”

This technical challenge reveals the core problem Apple set out to solve: creating a digital material that maintains form-changing capabilities while preserving transparency. Traditional UI elements either block content or disappear entirely, but Apple developed a material that can exist in multiple states without compromising visibility of underlying content. Dye’s emphasis on “celebrating user content” exposes Apple’s hierarchy philosophy, where the interface serves content instead of competing with it. When you tap to magnify text, the interface doesn’t resize but stretches and flows like liquid responding to pressure, ensuring your photos, videos, and web content remain the focus while navigation elements adapt around them.

“And then in terms of what we would call the data layer, we liked the idea that every application has its content. So Photos has all the imagery of your photos. We want that to be the star of the show. Safari, we want the webpage to be the focal point. So when you scroll, we’re able to get those controls out of the way, shrink the URL field in that case.”

Apple has established a clear priority system where Photos imagery, Safari web pages, and media content take precedence over navigational elements, instead of treating interface chrome and user content as equal elements competing for attention. This represents a shift from interface-centric design to content-centric design. The practical implementation becomes apparent when scrolling through Safari, where the URL field shrinks dynamically, or in Photos, where the imagery dominates the visual hierarchy while controls fade into the background. Controls fade and sharpen based on what you’re doing, creating interfaces that feel more natural and responsive, where every interaction provides clear visual feedback about what’s happening and where you are in the system.

“For everyday users, we think there’s this layer that’s the top level. Menu systems, back buttons, and controls. And then there’s the app content beneath. That’s how we determine what’s the glass layer versus the application layer.”

Dye’s explanation of the “glass layer versus application layer” architecture provides insight into how Apple technically implements this philosophy. The company has created a distinct separation between functional controls (the glass layer) and user content (the application layer), allowing each to behave according to different rules while maintaining visual cohesion. This architectural decision enables the morphing behavior Dye described, where controls can adapt and change while content remains stable and prominent.

The Physical Reality Behind Digital Glass

During one of Apple’s demo setups, my attention was drawn to a physical glass layer arranged over printed graphics. This display served as tangible simulation of the refractive effect that Liquid Glass achieves in the digital realm. As I stood above the installation, I could discern how the curves and layering of the glass distorted light, reshaping the visual hierarchy of the underlying graphics. This physical representation was more than decorative flourish; it served as a bridge, translating the complex theoretical underpinnings of Apple’s design approach into something tactile and comprehensible.

That moment of parallax and distortion functioned as a compelling real-world metaphor, illustrating how interface controls now transition between foreground and background elements. What I observed in that physical demonstration directly translated to my hands-on experience with the software: the same principles of light refraction, depth perception, and material behavior that govern real glass now influence how digital interfaces respond to interaction.

Hands-On: How Liquid Glass Changes Daily Interactions

My hands-on experience with the newly refreshed iOS 26, iPadOS 26, macOS Tahoe, and watchOS 26 immediately illuminated the essence of Liquid Glass. What Apple describes as “glass” now transcends static texture and behaves as a dynamic, responsive environment. Consider the tab bars in Music or the sidebar in Notes app: as I scrolled through content, subtle distortions became apparent beneath these interface elements, accompanied by live refraction effects that gently bent the underlying content. The instant I ceased scrolling, this distortion smoothly resolved, allowing the content to settle into clarity.

My focus this year remained on the flat-screen experience, as I did not demo Vision Pro or CarPlay. iOS, iPadOS, and macOS serve as demonstrations of how Liquid Glass adapts to various input models, with a mouse hover eliciting distinct behaviors compared to direct tap or swipe. The material possesses understanding of when to amplify content for prominence and when to recede into the background. Even during media playback, dynamic layers expand and contract, responding directly to how and when you engage with the screen.

The lock screen clock exemplifies Liquid Glass principles perfectly. The time display dynamically scales and adapts to the available space behind it, creating a sense that the interface is responding to the content instead of imposing rigid structure upon it. This adaptive behavior extends beyond scaling to include weight adjustments and spacing modifications that ensure optimal legibility regardless of wallpaper complexity.

On macOS, hovering with a mouse cursor creates subtle preview states in interface elements. Buttons and controls show depth and transparency changes that indicate their interactive nature without overwhelming the content beneath. Touch interactions on iOS and iPadOS create more pronounced responses, with elements providing haptic-like visual feedback that corresponds to the pressure and duration of contact. The larger screen real estate of iPadOS allows for more complex layering effects, where sidebars and toolbars create deeper visual hierarchies with multiple levels of transparency and refraction.

The difference from current iOS becomes apparent in specific scenarios. In the current Music app, scrolling through your library feels like moving through flat, static layers. With Liquid Glass, scrolling creates a sense of depth. You can see your album artwork subtly shifting beneath the translucent controls, creating spatial awareness of where interface elements sit in relation to your content. The tab bar doesn’t just scroll with you; it creates gentle optical distortions that make the underlying content feel physically present beneath the glass surface.

However, the clear aesthetic comes with notable trade-offs. While the transparency creates visual depth, readability can suffer in certain lighting conditions or with complex wallpapers. Apple has engineered an adaptive system that provides light backgrounds for dark content and dark backgrounds for light content, but the system faces challenges when backgrounds contain mixed lighting conditions. While testing the clear home screen option, where widgets and icons adopt full transparency, the aesthetic impact is striking but raises practical concerns. The interface achieves a modern, visionOS-inspired look that feels fresh and contemporary, yet this approach can compromise text legibility, with busy wallpapers or varying lighting conditions creating readability issues that become apparent during extended use.

The challenge becomes most apparent with notification text and menu items, where contrast can diminish to the point where information becomes difficult to parse quickly. Apple provides the clear transparency as an optional setting, acknowledging that maximum transparency isn’t suitable for all users or use cases. This represents one of the few areas where the visual appeal of Liquid Glass conflicts with practical usability, requiring users to make conscious choices about form versus function.

Even keyboard magnification, when activated by tapping to edit text, behaved not as resizing but as fluid digital glass reacting organically to touch pressure. This response felt natural, almost organic in its execution. The system rewards motion with clarity and precision, creating transitions that establish clear cause and effect while guiding your understanding of your current location within the interface and your intended destination. Across all platforms, this interaction dynamically ranges between 1.2x and 1.5x magnification, with the value determined by specific gesture, contextual environment, and interface density at that moment instead of being rigidly fixed.

This logic extends to watchOS, where pressing an icon or notification amplifies the element, creating magnification that feels less like conventional zoom and more like digital glass stretching forward. On the small watch screen, this creates a sense of interface elements having physical presence and weight. Touch targets feel more substantial with reflective surfaces and enhanced depth cues, making interactions feel more tactile despite the flat display surface.

While this interaction feels natural, the underlying mechanics are precisely controlled and deeply integrated. Apple has engineered a system that responds intelligently to context, gesture, and content type. Apple’s intention with Liquid Glass extends beyond replicating physical glass and instead represents recognition of the inherent qualities of physical materials: how light interacts with them, how they create distortion, and how they facilitate layering. These characteristics are then applied to digital environments, liberating them from the restrictive constraints of real-world physics.

Why This Matters for Daily Use

The result is a system that is elastic, contextually aware, and designed to recede when its presence is not required. Most individuals will not pause to dissect the underlying reasons why a particular interaction feels improved. Instead, they will perceive enhanced grounding when navigating iPadOS or watchOS, with sidebar elements conveying heightened solidity and magnification effects appearing intentional. Apple does not overtly publicize these changes; it engineers them to resonate with the user’s sense of interaction.

This translates to practical benefits: reduced cognitive load when navigating between apps, clearer visual hierarchy that helps you focus on content, and interface feedback that feels more natural and predictable. When you’re editing photos, the tools recede to let your images dominate. When you’re reading articles in Safari, the browser chrome adapts to keep text prominent. When you’re scrolling through messages, the conversation content remains clear while navigation elements provide subtle depth cues.

Liquid Glass represents a fundamental recalibration of how digital interfaces convey motion, spatial relationships, and control. The outcome is an experience that defies easy verbal articulation, yet one that you will find yourself unwilling to relinquish.

The post Apple’s Liquid Glass Hands-On: Why Every Interface Element Now Behaves Like Physical Material first appeared on Yanko Design.

Half a decade ago, the GPD MicroPC looked like something a sysadmin would carry to a LAN party for kicks – a rugged, 6-inch tank of a handheld PC powered by a sleepy Celeron N4100. Now in 2025, GPD has hit the refresh button, not with a tweak but with a hammer. The MicroPC 2 is here, and it’s sharper, faster, and still unapologetically nerdy.

Let’s get one thing clear: this is a machine built for people who know what a COM port is and why they need one. Field engineers, cybersecurity professionals, and anyone who’s ever SSH’d into a server from a parking lot will find a kindred spirit in the MicroPC 2. While its design echoes GPD’s more recent Pocket 4, the DNA is pure utility. Only this time, it’s not dragging behind in the performance stakes.

Designer: GPD

Under the hood, the original’s aging silicon has been chucked for something far more capable – the Intel Processor N250 from the Twin Lake family. It’s a quad-core chip built on Alder Lake-N architecture with four Gracemont E-cores pushing up to 3.8 GHz. No Hyper-Threading, but this isn’t a content creation box. This is for network diagnostics, terminal hopping, and managing Linux containers on the go. And yes, it’s over twice as powerful as the old N4100, while still staying within a 6W power envelope.

RAM gets a boost too – 16 GB of LPDDR5-4800, fast enough to make multi-tabbed terminal work and lightweight scripting feel snappy. Storage is handled via PCIe Gen 3 M.2 2280, which adds some welcome modularity if you ever need to upgrade or swap drives. GPD hasn’t disclosed the battery specs yet, but unless they botch it, the efficiency of the N250 and LPDDR5 combo should translate into solid endurance.

Screen-wise, GPD steps up from a cramped 6-inch to a 7-inch display. It’s a modest jump on paper, but in practice, the extra real estate matters when you’re navigating dense terminal windows or browser tabs in tight vertical space. It does gain about 10% in weight over the original, but here’s the kicker: it’s still roughly 36% lighter than the GPD Pocket 4. That’s no small feat when you’re keeping a full-sized I/O suite intact.

Speaking of ports, GPD hasn’t gone soft on legacy connectivity. Expect the usual suspects – USB-A, USB-C, RJ45 Ethernet, HDMI, and even a serial port for legacy systems. No dongles, no adapters, just raw, ready-to-work hardware. It’s the kind of machine that could just as easily live in a server rack as in a backpack.

And yet, the MicroPC 2 feels less like a niche relic and more like a deliberate rebellion against bloated ultraportables. It’s compact without being compromised, functional without trying to look fashionable. GPD knows their crowd and doesn’t bother chasing mainstream trends. This machine is unapologetically for the tech-savvy, the tool-wielders, the hackers, and tinkerers who value control over cosmetics.

There’s no pricing or release date yet, but assuming GPD plays within its usual sub-$800 ballpark, the MicroPC 2 will be hard to ignore for anyone who wants a true portable workstation, not a half-baked tablet, not a fashion-first laptop, but a proper, geek-approved productivity brick.

The post This Rugged Mini PC Is Built for Hackers, Tinkerers, and Total Geeks first appeared on Yanko Design.

The gaming laptop landscape has remained relatively stagnant for years, with manufacturers primarily focused on cramming more powerful processors and graphics cards into increasingly bulky chassis. While performance has steadily improved and some designs have indeed gotten slimmer, the fundamental design constraints have persisted: heavy cooling systems, short battery life, and thick profiles that scream “gamer” from across the room.

However, whispers from industry insiders suggest a seismic shift could be approaching. NVIDIA’s rumored partnership with MediaTek to develop an Arm-based gaming processor for Dell’s Alienware brand represents more than just another chip launch. This collaboration could fundamentally reshape how we think about gaming hardware design, potentially ushering in an era of impossibly thin, whisper-quiet gaming machines that rival ultrabooks in portability.

Designer: NVIDIA

Silicon Gambit: NVIDIA’s Bold Entry Into Arm PC Territory

Recent reports indicate NVIDIA is developing its first Arm-based APU specifically for gaming laptops, with Dell’s Alienware division serving as the launch partner. The rumored timeline places this revolutionary chip’s debut in late 2025 or early 2026, with the processor reportedly combining Arm CPU cores with NVIDIA’s cutting-edge Blackwell GPU architecture in a single, efficient package.

This marks NVIDIA’s most significant departure from traditional gaming hardware since the company’s early days. Unlike previous attempts by other manufacturers to bring Arm processors to Windows gaming, NVIDIA brings something unique to the table: decades of gaming graphics expertise and established relationships with game developers worldwide. Their GeForce Experience ecosystem already connects millions of gamers globally.

Designer: Nintendo

The strategic importance cannot be overstated. NVIDIA already powers gaming devices like the Nintendo Switch, and their GPUs dominate gaming, graphics, and AI workloads across countless systems. Now they have the opportunity to pioneer an entirely new category of gaming devices, potentially blazing a trail that other manufacturers will inevitably follow. The codename “N1/N1x” has surfaced in leaked documents, suggesting NVIDIA has been working on this project for a considerable time. Industry projections suggest NVIDIA expects to ship 3 million of these processors in 2025, scaling to 13 million by 2026.

Dell’s Alienware brand provides the perfect testing ground for such experimental technology. Known for pushing boundaries and commanding premium prices, Alienware customers are typically early adopters willing to pay for cutting-edge features. This partnership allows NVIDIA to gauge market reception before potentially expanding to other manufacturers and more mainstream gaming laptop lines.

Designer: Alienware (Dell)

Efficiency Revolution: Redefining Gaming Hardware Possibilities

The fundamental advantage of Arm architecture lies in its exceptional power efficiency compared to traditional x86 processors from Intel and AMD. Current Arm-powered Windows devices routinely achieve 12+ hours of battery life while maintaining fanless designs, a stark contrast to gaming laptops that typically struggle to reach two hours during intensive gaming sessions. ARM processors consume approximately 33% less power than equivalent x86 solutions in similar workloads, according to some benchmarks.

NVIDIA’s rumored 80-120 watt power envelope for their gaming APU represents a dramatic reduction compared to current high-performance gaming systems. This efficiency gain opens doors to design possibilities that were previously impossible: truly thin gaming laptops that could masquerade as business ultrabooks, eliminating the stigma some professionals face when carrying obviously gaming-focused hardware into corporate environments.

Designer: ASUS Republic of Gamers

The ripple effects extend far beyond laptops. Gaming handhelds currently suffer from severe battery limitations, with devices like the ASUS ROG Ally managing only 1-3 hours of gameplay compared to the Nintendo Switch’s 4-9 hour range. An efficient Arm-based gaming processor could finally deliver the holy grail: console-like performance with all-day battery life in a truly portable form factor.

NVIDIA’s industry influence could accelerate Windows on Arm adoption for gaming applications. While Qualcomm’s Snapdragon X processors have made impressive strides in general computing, gaming compatibility remains limited. NVIDIA’s established relationships with game developers and their DLSS optimization technologies could provide the catalyst needed to convince studios to prioritize Arm-native game development.

Designer: Microsoft

Cool Is The New Hot

The thermal benefits alone could revolutionize gaming laptop design. Reduced heat generation means smaller cooling solutions, freeing internal space for larger batteries or enabling impossibly thin chassis designs. Imagine gaming laptops that operate silently during intensive sessions, perfect for content creators, streamers, or anyone who values a quiet workspace without sacrificing performance. Current gaming laptops often require aggressive fan curves that create distracting noise during important video calls or recordings.

Battery technology improvements compound these advantages. Modern laptop batteries have reached capacity limits within reasonable weight constraints, but Arm efficiency could effectively double usable gaming time without increasing battery size. Alternatively, manufacturers could maintain current battery life while dramatically reducing weight and thickness, creating ultraportable gaming machines that were previously impossible to engineer.

Form, Function, Fashion

Form factor innovation becomes feasible when thermal constraints disappear. Gaming laptops could adopt convertible designs, detachable screens, or even tablet-like configurations while maintaining high performance. The rigid rectangular laptop format has persisted partly due to cooling requirements, but efficient processors open possibilities for more creative and user-friendly designs.

Designer: Razer

Material selection also expands significantly. Current gaming laptops rely heavily on aluminum and plastic for heat dissipation and durability. Lower operating temperatures permit exotic materials like carbon fiber, magnesium alloys, or even premium leather and fabric finishes that would overheat with traditional processors. This could blur the line between gaming hardware and luxury consumer electronics.

The Compatibility Conundrum: Navigating Uncharted Waters

Despite the exciting possibilities, significant challenges loom on the horizon. Current Windows on Arm compatibility remains problematic for gaming, with industry analysis showing that barely 55% of tested PC games run smoothly without bugs or glitches. Popular multiplayer titles like League of Legends, Destiny 2, and Fortnite remain completely unplayable due to anti-cheat software incompatibilities that treat Arm processors as potential security threats.

Software emulation adds another layer of complexity. While Windows on Arm can run x86 applications through Microsoft’s Prism emulation layer, this process consumes additional power and processing resources, potentially negating some of the efficiency advantages that make Arm appealing for gaming applications in the first place. Emulated games often experience performance penalties ranging from 15-30% compared to native execution.

Hardware compatibility presents equally daunting obstacles. Many gaming peripherals, specialized input devices, and even basic hardware like printers and scanners rely on x86-specific drivers that may not function properly on Arm systems. Professional gamers and enthusiasts who depend on specific hardware configurations might find themselves locked out of the Arm ecosystem entirely until manufacturers develop compatible drivers.

The gaming ecosystem extends beyond individual titles to include streaming software, voice chat applications, and content creation tools that professional streamers and content creators depend upon. OBS Studio, Discord, and various capture cards may require significant updates to function properly on Arm systems. This creates a chicken-and-egg problem where adoption remains limited until compatibility improves, but compatibility won’t improve without sufficient market demand.

Anti-cheat systems represent perhaps the most significant barrier to Arm gaming adoption. Popular multiplayer games rely on kernel-level anti-cheat software that must be specifically compiled and optimized for Arm processors. Companies like BattlEye and Easy Anti-Cheat have shown reluctance to support niche platforms, potentially leaving entire game genres inaccessible to Arm users for years after hardware launches.

Legacy game compatibility poses additional concerns for PC gaming enthusiasts who maintain libraries spanning decades. While newer titles might eventually receive Arm-native versions, older games may never be updated, relying permanently on emulation with its associated performance penalties and potential compatibility issues. This threatens the PC platform’s traditional strength in backward compatibility.

Blueprint for Tomorrow: Designing the Impossible

NVIDIA’s Arm gaming initiative represents more than incremental improvement; it offers the potential for fundamental design paradigm shifts. However, success depends on overcoming significant software compatibility hurdles while delivering the performance gamers expect. The technical foundations exist, but execution will determine whether this becomes a revolution or merely an interesting footnote in gaming history.

Designer: MediaTek

The most profound impact may not be in raw performance metrics, but in enabling entirely new categories of gaming devices that weren’t previously feasible. As the industry stands at this crossroads, the choices made in balancing performance, compatibility, and design innovation will shape the next decade of gaming hardware development. Manufacturers are watching NVIDIA’s efforts closely, ready to follow if the experiment succeeds.

Manufacturing implications extend throughout the supply chain. Cooling system suppliers, battery manufacturers, and chassis designers must adapt to radically different thermal and power requirements. This transition could favor smaller, more agile manufacturers over established giants who have optimized their production lines for traditional gaming laptop architectures. Component miniaturization becomes both possible and necessary.

From Trickle to Flood

The competitive landscape could shift dramatically if NVIDIA succeeds. Intel and AMD have dominated gaming processors for decades, but their x86 architectures carry inherent efficiency limitations that Arm designs avoid. A successful NVIDIA Arm-based gaming laptop could force these established players to accelerate their own efficiency improvements or risk losing market share to more innovative competitors.

Consumer expectations will evolve alongside the technology. Current gaming laptop buyers accept short battery life and loud fans as necessary compromises for high performance. Arm-based systems could reset these expectations, making traditional gaming laptops seem obsolete and overly compromised. This psychological shift might prove as important as the technical advantages in driving market adoption.

While the technical challenges are substantial, the design possibilities enabled by efficient Arm-based gaming represent the most significant opportunity for product innovation in the PC gaming space since the introduction of discrete mobile graphics. The question isn’t whether this transition will happen, but whether NVIDIA can execute it successfully enough to realize these design possibilities and convince the broader industry to follow suit.

The post The Next Gaming Revolution: How NVIDIA’s Arm-Powered Laptop Could Rewrite Design Rules first appeared on Yanko Design.

You know something extraordinary is happening when a single company wins 41 Red Dot Design Awards across five completely different categories in one year. ASUS didn’t just collect these awards like trading cards; they earned recognition from 43 international design experts for solving real problems across smartphones, laptops, displays, and even backpacks. The Zenfone 12 Ultra alone would have made headlines with its gimbal-stabilized camera that turns shaky vacation videos into smooth cinematic footage. But that’s just the beginning of this story. We’re talking about gaming phones that survive military testing while looking sophisticated enough for boardrooms, OLED monitors calibrated specifically for photographers who can’t afford color shifts, and mini PCs powerful enough to replace full towers yet small enough to hide behind your monitor. The real question isn’t how ASUS won so many awards, but rather how they managed to excel in categories where specialized companies usually dominate. How does the same company that makes RGB gaming keyboards also create color-accurate displays that professional photographers trust?

Designer: ASUS

Three Smartphones That Each Solve Different Problems

The smartphone wins perfectly demonstrate ASUS’s understanding that different users need fundamentally different devices. Take the Zenfone 12 Ultra, which tackles the universal problem of shaky photos and videos with actual hardware rather than just software tricks. Its 6-Axis Hybrid Gimbal Stabilizer 4.0 sounds like technical overkill until you see the results. Walking videos that normally resemble earthquake footage suddenly become smooth, tracking shots. Low-light photos that would require a tripod become possible handheld. The 50MP Sony Lytia 700 sensor benefits from this stability in ways that go beyond specs, paired with a 32MP telephoto offering 3x optical zoom and a 13MP ultrawide for versatility. ASUS wrapped this technology in a 220g body featuring 100% recycled aluminum and silky matte glass that actually resists fingerprints, addressing another daily annoyance we’ve all accepted as inevitable.

The ROG Phone 9 and ROG Phone 9 Pro approach mobile design from a completely different angle, prioritizing gaming performance without sacrificing daily usability. Both models feature IP68 water resistance, which you rarely see in gaming phones because manufacturers assume gamers baby their devices. The 185Hz E6 AMOLED display with 720Hz touch sampling delivers response times that competitive mobile gamers need, while 2500 nits peak brightness means you can see the screen outdoors. The Pro model goes further with up to 24GB of RAM and 1TB of storage, as mobile games are becoming increasingly large. What’s clever here is the integration of Dirac Virtuo spatial sound and Qualcomm aptX Lossless, recognizing that hearing enemy footsteps matters as much as seeing them. The 5800mAh battery with 65W charging keeps sessions going, while the customizable AniMe Vision display on the back adds personality without going full RGB circus.

Gaming Laptops That Don’t Scream “I Live in My Mom’s Basement”

The laptop category reveals that ASUS is solving a problem many professionals face: wanting gaming performance without looking like they’ve brought a spaceship to the office. The TUF Gaming A14 represents their first 14-inch gaming laptop, and at 1.46 kg, it fits in a standard laptop bag. Running AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 processors with RTX 4060 graphics, this machine delivers legitimate gaming performance through a 165Hz QHD+ (2560×1600) display that’s sharp enough for spreadsheets and fast enough for shooters. The military-grade durability means it survives daily commutes, addressing the reality that gaming laptops need to handle more than just desk duty.

The ROG FLOW Z13 takes versatility to extremes as a 2-in-1 gaming tablet that sounds impossible until you use it. The 13.4-inch 2560×1600 touchscreen runs at 180Hz, powered by AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 processors with up to 128GB RAM. At $2,099, it’s not cheap, but it replaces multiple devices. Use it as a tablet for digital art, prop it up for gaming sessions, or connect an external GPU for desktop performance when needed. The form factor solves real problems for creators who game and gamers who create, eliminating the need to choose between specialized devices.

Meanwhile, the ROG Strix Scar 16 and 18 embrace traditional gaming laptop design but elevate it with ROG Nebula HDR Display technology. These machines pack Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX processors and up to RTX 5090 Laptop GPUs, delivering 2.5K resolution at 240Hz through Mini LED backlighting. The tool-less upgrade design acknowledges that gamers want to upgrade components over time, while up to 64GB DDR5 RAM ensures these laptops won’t become obsolete next year.

Consumer Laptops That Understand Consumer Needs

ASUS’s consumer laptop wins show they’re paying attention to how people use computers. The Vivobook 14 and 16 Flip models embrace the 2-in-1 concept with 360-degree hinges and OLED touchscreens, powered by Intel Core Ultra 7 processors. At 1.69cm thick and 1.5kg, these machines prove that convertibles don’t need to be chunky. The Vivobook Classic Series strips away gimmicks to focus on reliability and value, while the ASUS V16 provides 16-inch productivity without the bulk typically associated with larger screens.

ASUS Vivobook Pro 15

The Zenbook S 14 and S 16 represent ASUS’s premium ultrabook vision, featuring Intel Core Ultra processors with Copilot+ PC capabilities. These machines balance performance with portability, using premium materials and finishes that justify their positioning. But the real standout is the Zenbook A14, which earned recognition as the world’s lightest 14-inch Copilot+ PC at just 2.18 pounds. Powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon X processors, it delivers up to 32 hours of battery life thanks to ARM efficiency. The 14-inch OLED display (1920×1200) with 100% DCI-P3 coverage provides color accuracy typically reserved for much more expensive machines, while the Ceraluminum construction creates a premium feel in the $899-$1,099 range.

Business Laptops Built for Real Business Use

The commercial wins reveal ASUS’s understanding of what IT departments and business users need. The ExpertBook P5 represents their flagship business machine, powered by Intel Core Ultra processors (Series 2) with up to 120 total platform TOPS of AI performance. Weighing just 1.29 kg, it packs a 2.5K 144Hz anti-glare display and offers up to 28 hours of battery life. The inclusion of ASUS AI ExpertMeet provides intelligent noise cancellation and real-time transcription with on-device processing, addressing privacy concerns while adding genuine utility for remote workers.

The ExpertBook B3 takes a different approach with its 16-inch display and connectivity focus. At 1.78kg, it includes features business users request: optional 5G LTE, Wi-Fi 6E, dual Thunderbolt 4 ports, and smart card readers. The 85% screen-to-body ratio maximizes working space, while MIL-STD-810H durability testing ensures it survives the reality of business travel and daily office use.

All-in-Ones and Desktops for Different Tribes

The desktop category spans from space-saving all-in-ones to gaming powerhouses. The AiO VM6 Series and ExpertCenter AiO P4 series represent ASUS’s approach to integrated computing, ideal for reception areas, home offices, or anywhere cable management is a concern. These systems prove that all-in-ones don’t need to compromise on performance or upgradeability.

Gaming desktops are split between the TUF Gaming T5 series, which emphasizes durability and value, and the ROG G7 series, designed for enthusiasts who seek maximum performance with premium aesthetics. These systems recognize that not everyone wants to build their own PC, offering pre-configured options that cater to their target audiences.

The Mini PC Renaissance Nobody Expected

Perhaps the most interesting wins come from ASUS’s commitment to mini PCs, a category that most companies abandoned. The ExpertCenter PN54 packs an AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 processor with 45+ NPU TOPS in a 0.5L chassis, complete with six USB ports, dual 2.5G LAN, and Wi-Fi 7. This isn’t a streaming box; it’s a legitimate workstation that happens to fit in the palm of your hand.

The NUC 15 Pro and NUC 15 Pro+ take it a step further with Intel Core Ultra 7/9 processors (Series 2), up to 96GB of DDR5 RAM, and support for four 4K displays simultaneously. The tool-less upgradability means these systems can evolve with your needs, while thoughtful port selection eliminates the dongle mess that plagues other compact systems. What earned recognition was the thermal management that keeps these systems quiet under load, solving the jet engine problem that traditionally plagued small form factor PCs.

Displays That Serve Their Actual Users

ASUS’s monitor wins reveal a deep understanding of different user needs. The ProArt Display PA27UCGE and PA32UCE are designed exclusively for color accuracy, featuring built-in motorized colorimeters and hardware calibration. These displays deliver 98% DCI-P3 coverage with Delta E<1 accuracy at 160Hz refresh rates and 600 nits brightness, specifications that matter to photographers and video editors who can’t afford color shifts between devices.

The ProArt Display OLED series brings OLED technology to professional workflows where perfect blacks and infinite contrast translate to better creative decisions. ASUS prioritized burn-in protection and color accuracy over gaming features, showing they understand professional priorities.

Gaming gets serious attention with the ROG Swift OLED series. The PG32UCDM features a 32-inch 4K QD-OLED display with a 240Hz refresh rate and 0.03ms response time, while the PG27AQDP achieves refresh rates of up to 480Hz at 1440p. Custom heatsinks and OLED Care+ features address burn-in concerns, proving ASUS understands the hesitation around OLED for desktop use.

The ZenScreen Duo OLED MQ149CD offers dual portable screens in one device, ideal for presentations where you need to display content while keeping notes private. The ZenScreen Smart MS27UC and MS32UC build smart TV functionality directly into monitors, eliminating streaming device clutter in small spaces.

Graphics Cards and Components That Know Their Lane

The GPU wins demonstrate clear market segmentation. The ROG Astral RTX 50 series targets enthusiasts wanting maximum performance with premium cooling solutions. The liquid-cooled ROG Astral LC RTX 50 series pushes further for users prioritizing silence over everything else. Meanwhile, the TUF Gaming RTX 50 series offers military-grade reliability at more accessible price points, demonstrating that durability doesn’t require premium pricing.

The ProArt Z890-CREATOR WIFI motherboard shows ASUS understanding that creators need different features than gamers. Instead of overclocking potential and RGB zones, this board focuses on stability, Thunderbolt connectivity, high-speed storage options, and professional-grade audio interfaces that actually matter for content creation workflows.

Accessories That Solve Actual Problems

The peripheral wins aren’t just about RGB and aggressive styling. The ROG Azoth Extreme earned recognition as a 75% gaming keyboard with a full aluminum alloy chassis, a carbon fiber positioning plate, and an OLED touchscreen that actually serves a purpose for customization. The ROG Harpe Ace Extreme mouse weighs just 47 grams thanks to carbon fiber construction, while packing a 42,000-dpi ROG AimPoint Pro optical sensor for users who need that level of precision.

The ASUS Master Thunderbolt 5 Dock DC510 addresses the cable chaos plaguing modern desks with enough bandwidth to run multiple 4K displays, storage arrays, and peripherals through a single cable. The thoughtful port placement and clean design demonstrate an understanding of how these devices are actually used in real workspaces.

Even the ROG SLASH Backpack series has earned recognition for solving specific problems that gamers face when transporting expensive hardware. These aren’t just bags with gaming logos; they feature dedicated compartments, actual protection systems, and thoughtful organization for cables and peripherals. The RT-BE58 Go router, ProArt PA401 PC case, and ASUS Cobble Enclosure storage solution round out the accessories, each addressing specific user needs rather than just filling product categories.

What This Design Sweep Actually Tells Us About Technology’s Future

Looking at these 41 wins collectively reveals something important about where technology design is heading. ASUS succeeded by recognizing that one-size-fits-all products satisfy nobody in 2025. A professional photographer needs fundamentally different display features than a competitive gamer. A business user values different laptop attributes than a content creator. A student needs different price points than an enterprise customer.

The sustainability angle running through many products also matters more than the press releases suggest. When premium products lead with 100% recycled aluminum frames and FSC-certified packaging, it normalizes these choices across entire product lines. Environmental consideration is becoming integral to good design rather than a marketing checkbox.

AI integration across categories shows ASUS betting on intelligence over raw specifications. The Zenfone 12 Ultra’s AI Transcript 2.0 converts meeting recordings to searchable documents without cloud processing. The ExpertBook P5’s AI ExpertMeet handles noise cancellation and camera framing locally. These features address real productivity needs while respecting privacy concerns.

Perhaps most importantly, these awards suggest the industry is moving past the era of spec sheet battles. ASUS won by solving specific user frustrations: shaky videos, gaming laptops that look unprofessional, mini PCs that throttle, displays with inconsistent colors, cable management nightmares. Each product addresses real problems people face daily rather than inventing new features nobody requested.

The breadth of this achievement, spanning from pocket-sized smartphones to professional workstations, demonstrates that good design principles scale across categories while respecting each segment’s unique demands. As the technology industry continues chasing bigger numbers and flashier features, ASUS’s focus on thoughtful problem-solving through design points toward a more user-centric future. Whether this translates to market success remains to be seen, but these 41 awards suggest they’re asking the right questions about what technology should actually do for the people who use it every day.

The post ASUS Dominates 2025 Red Dot Awards with 41 Wins Across Every Category That Matters first appeared on Yanko Design.

Motorola famously worked with Steve Jobs to bring iTunes to the Razr. Jobs hated the idea of having their software run on someone else’s hardware (which is why he created the iPhone), but up until Apple was ready to formally launch a phone, Jobs reluctantly partnered with Motorola. Now, for what it’s worth, there’s a Moto Razr out there, not with iTunes, but rather, with Windows XP running on it!

Shared on Reddit by Constant_Vehicle7539, this foldable Moto Razr 40 Ultra is running an emulated version of the famous Windows OS. The best part is that when opened halfway, it actually becomes a mini laptop of sorts, giving you a functional (or aesthetically functional, if I’m being accurate) Windows laptop – perhaps the smallest one ever made.

Designer: Constant_Vehicle7539

It’s crazy to actually see this in action. Constant_Vehicle7539 uses the Vectras VM QEMU emulator to run a Windows XP build on the phone. While there’s really no photo of the phone actually running an instance of the desktop (Constant_Vehicle7539 probably just didn’t take any photos), the images here show the boot screen and a few images of the OS setup. My favorite part is when the phone’s half open, looking like a miniature laptop with a touch keyboard. Apparently, Vectras VM offers different emulators, even Windows 11… but for us OG Windows users from back in the day, when we rocked Razrs, Ericssons, and Nokia N Series phones, this is a match made in heaven.

The emulator allows you to run an instance of Windows on any Android, so if you’ve got a dormant old phone lying in a cabinet gathering dust, this is a fun project you could work on. Your friends will be absolutely shocked to see Windows running on a smartphone. However, the only thing more shocking than this is the one time a crazy hacker managed to port iOS 18 onto a Nokia Lumia phone, making the operating system think it was an iPhone (with functional TouchID too!)

The post Moto Razr 40 Ultra Running Windows XP Is The Ultimate Tech Crossover We Didn’t Expect first appeared on Yanko Design.

While most laptop stands disappear into the background, this sculptural wooden MacBook stand instantly catches the eye with its striking form. At first glance, it looks more like a piece of contemporary art than a desk accessory, with flowing lines and smooth curves that play with light and shadow. It’s easy to imagine it as the centerpiece of a thoughtfully arranged workspace, quietly inviting second glances from anyone passing by. For those who appreciate design that blends utility with beauty, this stand offers an experience that feels refreshing and unexpected.

Spending hours hunched over a laptop is a recipe for sore shoulders and an aching neck, especially when your screen sits too low. This stand gently lifts your MacBook to a more natural height, guiding you toward a straighter, more comfortable posture. It’s a simple change with noticeable effects; suddenly, working long hours feels a touch less taxing. The open space beneath the stand isn’t just for show, either; it creates a little haven for your daily essentials, freeing up precious desktop real estate.

Designer: Yohann

There’s a satisfying weight to the stand that sets it apart from the mass-produced world of aluminum and plastic alternatives. Crafted from natural oak or walnut, the wood grain varies with every piece, making each stand quietly unique. The subtle sheen of a well-finished wood surface brings a warmth that’s hard to replicate with synthetic materials, softening the high-tech feel of your MacBook. The careful workmanship is evident in every detail and curve, showing off a blend of Swiss design precision and traditional Italian and German craftsmanship.

Tech accessories often feel like afterthoughts, but this stand is designed with both sustainability and longevity in mind. The wood is responsibly sourced, so you can feel good about your purchase without sacrificing style. Over time, the stand develops a character all its own, as the wood responds to your touch and the rhythms of daily use. It’s a quiet nod to craftsmanship and environmental awareness that feels especially welcome in a world of disposable gadgets.

The practical benefits go beyond ergonomics and aesthetics. With your MacBook perched confidently above the clutter, your entire workspace feels lighter and more organized. Sliding your keyboard, mouse, or even a sketchbook underneath the stand becomes second nature, helping you reclaim valuable space whether you’re working from a tiny apartment or a spacious studio. It’s the kind of detail that makes everyday routines smoother, all while drawing the occasional compliment from anyone who stops by.

Above all, this wooden MacBook stand manages to be both eye-catching and understated, serving as a reminder that functional objects don’t have to be boring. Instead of hiding your desk accessories, you might find yourself showing them off, proof that a workspace can be both inspiring and practical. It’s a subtle celebration of form, function, and the simple pleasure of a well-made object.

The post Sculptural Wooden MacBook Stand Blends Art and Ergonomics for Modern Desks first appeared on Yanko Design.

PROS:

• Easy, tool-less RAM and SSD access and replacement


• Excellent performance and impressive cooling


• More refined, premium-looking design


• AniMe Vision matrix display for some gamer flair


• Stunning matte Mini LED display

CONS:

• Slightly larger and heavier than previous gen


• Quite pricey

RATINGS:

AESTHETICS

ERGONOMICS

PERFORMANCE

SUSTAINABILITY / REPAIRABILITY

VALUE FOR MONEY

EDITOR'S QUOTE:

The ASUS Strix SCAR 18 (2025) delivers a powerhouse of a gaming laptop wrapped in a design that's modern, mature, and premium.

Typical gaming laptops come in thick, bulky chassis with flashy lighting. The former is a result of cramming as many high-performance components as possible in such a cramped space, while the latter is a product of boxing gamer aesthetics into a particular stereotype. As more people embrace video gaming, however, the variety of design tastes also grows, with some preferring their gaming gear to be a bit more discreet and subtle.

Announced earlier this year, the ASUS ROG Strix SCAR 18 (2025) is bringing more than just the latest and greatest in PC gaming technologies. It also arrived with a redesigned appearance, breaking away from its peers to some degree. But does the gaming laptop’s embrace of subdued aesthetics also mean it cuts down on its performance? We give this racing car-inspired powerhouse a spin to see if it manages to strike a balance between power and beauty that will appeal to a wider audience.

Designer: ASUS Republic of Gamers

Aesthetics

You might be surprised by the sight that greets you when you remove the ROG Strix SCAR 18 (2025) from its packaging. You immediately behold a frame that looks premium, eschewing the shiny plastic surfaces and geometric details that deck most gaming laptops. Instead, the soft-touch matte black material on its back gives it a sleeker, more premium personality, a design language that ASUS seems to be adopting across its laptop line.

That design continues inside, where the semi-transparent keyboard deck of last year’s model is replaced with an opaque, all-black case that is less distracting and, to be honest, looks more professional. If you turn all the RGB lights off, the ROG Strix SCAR 18 (2025) could easily pass off for a business laptop, though a rather bulky one at that. The one complaint we have with this smoother texture is how it easily smudges, so you’ll find yourself wiping surfaces more often to keep them looking pristine and presentable.

Of course, a Republic of Gamers laptop is still designed for gamers, and those who do want some flair will find plenty of sliders and switches to play with. In addition to the lightbar that runs around the bottom of the chassis and the standard keyboard backlighting, the Strix SCAR 18 (2025) brings the AniMe Vision matrix display from the ROG Zephyrus line, providing 810 LEDs shining through 9,152 precision-milled holes that you can control to show off some lo-fi text or images, both static and animated. The ROG logo sitting in the corner also has its own RGB lights, though it might be a little too big for our tastes.

The ASUS ROG Strix SCAR 18 (2025) delivers a design that successfully pulls off a tough balancing act, providing a sophisticated and premium look that can still flaunt all those bright RGB colors if wanted. It is distinctly gaming-oriented without having to shout it, preferring to let its performance do the talking.

Ergonomics

There’s no escaping the laws of physics, and until the day we can truly shrink hardware and develop some magical cooling technology, there will always be concessions when it comes to balancing power and portability. Gaming laptops are unsurprisingly the worst offenders in this matter, and this year’s ROG Strix SCAR 18 sadly takes a step back.

Although the Strix SCAR 18 (2025) is an upgrade in almost every other aspect, it is also slightly larger and noticeably heavier than its predecessor. The good news is that it isn’t for naught, because the newer model does pack an improved cooling system as well as a more modular design, but it’s still something potential buyers will have to consider to manage their expectations, not to mention prepare their backs or shoulders when lugging it around.

The SCAR 18 (2025)’s more streamlined design also has ramifications for its usability, particularly with the ports. Gone are the side exhausts, allowing the connectivity ports to be pushed backward a bit. ASUS also took the opportunity to add a third full-sized USB-A port, probably to the delight of many gamers and computer users whose favorite accessories haven’t yet moved to the age of USB-C. The power connector has also been redesigned with a new rectangular plug instead of a round barrel. Unfortunately, the power cable has also been changed to stick out from the side rather than at a 90-degree angle like last year’s charger.

The ergonomics of the keyboard and the large touchpad are quite good, providing comfort and precision despite not having your ideal mechanical switches. One thing that might throw off new users, however, is the non-standard position of the cursor keys and the layout of the numeric keypad. It’s not a complete deal-breaker, but one that will require developing some muscle memory that you can’t carry over to other keyboards or laptops.

Performance

The ASUS ROG Strix SCAR 18 (2025) is an upgrade in every sense of the word, bearing the latest and greatest Intel chip, the Core Ultra 9 275HX. This is paired with a Series 5000 NVIDIA graphics card, which will naturally depend on what model you’ll have. Our review unit, the G835LW, comes with a GeForce RTX 5080, while there are also options for a 5070 (G835LR) and the highest 5090 (G835LX). Out of the box, you get 32GB of RAM and 2TB of SSD storage, but you can easily double that, as we’ll see later.

Long story short, this machine is a beast, making short work of modern AAA titles. Of course, don’t expect to get desktop-grade performance that will let you crank up all the settings to 11, but you won’t be far off either. What’s more impressive than the benchmark numbers is how stable that performance is, particularly thanks to an improved cooling system this year.

In addition to your typical high-capacity fans, which now number three, the Strix SCAR 18 (2025) features heatsinks that stretch across the whole width of the laptop. Also running from end to end is the vapor chamber sandwiched between these heatsinks. Completely new to this generation, however, is the Conductonaut Extreme liquid metal that replaces your typical thermal paste on the CPU and the GPU. All these work together to keep thermals down to a manageable level and keep the laptop running in peak condition for far longer.

While performance is something you’ll only be able to feel when actually pushing the laptop to its limits, the stunning 18-inch Mini LED is a beauty that you’ll be able to immediately see and appreciate. It definitely has a laundry list of features that not only gamers but also designers will love, starting with the 2.5K resolution and 1200 nits of peak brightness. 100% DCI-P3 coverage ensures color accuracy, while 240Hz refresh rates mean your content will be able to keep up with the action. Vibrant, colorful, and fluid, this screen is pretty much the mouth-watering icing on top of the cake that is the laptop’s performance.

Battery life, on the other hand, isn’t as impressive. It’s still the same 90Wh capacity from last year’s model, so its average expectancy isn’t that much. You’d be lucky to get even an hour of gaming with medium settings, which is quite average among gaming laptops. ASUS did upgrade the charger to 380W from 330W, so you have a shorter charging time.

The bonus is that the ROG Strix SCAR 18 (2025) now supports 100W PD (Power Delivery) charging via USB-C, which expands charging options just a bit. Of course, it’s still slower and won’t be able to support heavy gaming compared to the official power brick, but it’s better than completely draining your battery dry in less than an hour.

The ASUS ROG Strix SCAR 18 (2025) definitely doesn’t hold back when it comes to performance, making it an excellent portable workstation for designers and creators as well. There’s no denying that it offers one of, if not, the best options in the gaming laptop market, but the real question is whether that justifies the price that ASUS is asking for in turn. We’ll get to that in a bit, but first, we make a segue into what is probably the third-best thing about the laptop after its sophisticated beauty and unmatched performance.

Sustainability

At first glance, the Strix SCAR 18 (2025) is your typical mix of metal and plastic that you’d find in many gaming laptops. In fact, you might even be disappointed to find out that there’s still quite a lot of plastic, especially on the interior deck, rather than the aluminum that premium laptops have begun to flaunt. That said, the plastic does help with keeping things a bit cooler and even a little bit lighter, despite the laptop being quite a heavyweight.

ROG added one feature that trumps all that, though. With a simple slide of a latch, you can easily remove the back panel to have instant access to SSD and RAM slots. Even better, ASUS has brought its Q-Latch system to easily remove and replace the SSDs with just a plastic hinge. The fans and battery are also quickly exposed, though those will require a bit more work to take out. The motherboard is also well protected with a special frame but is still just a few screws away. This tool-less access to the most commonly upgraded components ensures that the Strix SCAR 18 (2025) will last you a long, long time.

Value

Subtly sophisticated, impressively powerful, and easily upgradable, the ASUS ROG Strix SCAR 18 (2025) almost has it all. The combination of refined aesthetics and flexibility to show off your gamer DNA positions this laptop as a powerhouse not just for gaming but for any endeavor that requires extensive processing, which usually includes AI these days. It’s almost perfect except for one particularly thorny subject: the price.

The G835LW with an RTX 5080 fetches a jaw-dropping $3,399.99, and the highest configuration easily goes for $4,449.99. That puts it close to luxury laptop territory, which isn’t something you might call such a gaming laptop, especially one that still has plenty of plastic to go around. Between these two, this G835LW model we’re reviewing seems to have the best balance, compromising just a little bit on performance for a huge cut in cost. Are there other options in this price range? Definitely. But are there other options in this price range that offer this trifecta of style, power, and longevity? Probably not.

Verdict

We’re entering an age where gaming laptops are no longer just hulking portable counterparts of their desktop cousins. As user tastes evolve, so too, do laptop designs. Those neon-lit futuristic slabs won’t disappear, but we’ll be getting an infusion of gaming laptops that cast their nets wider to appeal to a more diverse audience, some of which might not want to broadcast their gaming passion 24/7.

The ASUS ROG Strix SCAR 18 (2025) manages to strike a balance that will probably satisfy a good number of gamers of different aesthetic preferences. It cuts a rather captivating image of a powerful portable machine that can handle any task without breaking a sweat. Yes when you turn the RGB lights on and bring the AniMe Vision display to life, it immediately transforms into a dynamic battle station that will carry you to victory. The price tag is definitely a bitter pill to swallow, but you can rest assured that you’re getting you’re money’s worth, especially in the long term.

The post ASUS ROG Strix SCAR 18 (2025) Review: Subtly Sophisticated Performance Powerhouse first appeared on Yanko Design.

I didn’t expect to find the Huawei MateBook Fold Ultimate Design foldable laptop on the floor at BEYOND Expo, and it wasn’t officially displayed at Huawei’s booth. But I did see a nervous intern walking around with a strange-looking laptop behind the scenes. I walked up to ask her if it was Huawei’s new ‘foldable laptop’ and lo and behold, I got a hands-on experience of a device hardly anybody’s seen before… and spoilers, it’s gorgeous.

The MateBook Fold Ultimate Design is the kind of stuff you expect from companies like Apple and Google, but it really does seem like Huawei’s been pushing the envelope farther than any ‘Western’ brands. They mastered 5G before anyone, developed their own app ecosystem after being booted off Android, brought the Mate XT tri-fold device to market long before Samsung, and now managed to design, launch, and even display a foldable laptop long before anyone else could even get their R&D together.

Designer: Huawei

The MateBook Fold Ultimate Design (let’s just call it the MateBook Fold for short) is a bona fide luxury device. It costs a mind-bending $3,300 USD and is only available in China for now. That’s because it’s running Huawei’s HarmonyOS, which works best within the mainland. However, physically, the laptop looks GORGEOUS. At 14.9mm, it’s slightly thicker than the 128mm-thick tri-fold phone when shut (because it technically also has 3 panels), but open it up and you’re either faced with a 13″ laptop with a touchscreen keyboard, or an 18″ touchscreen monitor when opened fully (thanks to a kickstand at the back).

The third panel? Well, that’s just the MateBook Fold’s snap-on keyboard, which works wirelessly with the device, allowing you to use it either independently or even placed on top of the MateBook, replacing the touchscreen keyboard with a tactile one. News flash, everything works absolutely seamlessly – you don’t need to pair or unpair keyboards, the screen transitions like magic between multiple formats, and the device, even though it released just 3 days ago, doesn’t have any rough edges that I can see. It’s all polished to the point of being a product you could throw 3.3 grand at today itself.

So, here’s really what you get with the MateBook Fold. The three-part device (a two-part foldable and one snap-on keyboard) is as light as it gets – 2.5 lb (1.16 kg) officially, which is still lighter than a 13″ MacBook Pro. The keyboard sticks confidently via magnets, only snapping out when you remove it with intent. Even the hinge on the MateBook Fold – reliable, without a doubt. I needed two hands to pry the thing open, and once you disengage the device, the hinge loosens so that the lid lifts up comfortably.

The MateBook Fold’s design enables hybrid-laptop-style usage, but with a key difference being the foldable display itsel. You can use it in the following formats – open it up and type on the lower touchscreen like a regular laptop (you can change the keyboard design, layout, color, it’s wild). My favorite part is the fact that when you activate the on-screen keyboard, the Huawei branding actually shows up near the hinge, displaying the company logo where you’d expect it to be on most traditional laptops. You might think of it as an easter egg, but I see it more as incredible attention to detail.

The other way to type is to simply snap out the actual physical keyboard and use it to type (either on top of the laptop or kept on the side). However, if that 13″ screen isn’t enough for you, the MateBook Fold opens up to become a flat 18″ 3.3K display with a more tablet-ish 4:3 resolution. Hold and use the device like you would an 18″ tablet, place it flat on a tabletop, or prop it upwards, thanks to the built-in kickstand that otherwise sits flush against the back. There’s not a single bump anywhere on the device – the absence of a primary camera rids the MateBook Fold of its camera bump, so you’re left with a device that’s as gorgeously sleek as a laptop.

The OS, for now, is Huawei’s HarmonyOS, running a tablet-PC hybrid layout. You have apps on the desktop, like TikTok, Xiaohongshu (or Red Note), WPS Office, among other local apps. Huawei’s even built a Copilot clone that runs on the device thanks to a dedicated AI key. The company’s worked with Deepseek AI to integrate its chatbot into the MateBook Fold, giving you what I can only describe as an experience that’s absolutely tailormade to and with China-based innovation. For a company scorned by the US and several other countries, this is nothing short of remarkable. I don’t say it to artificially glorify the company or the circumstances it finds itself in, but hey, it’s been half a year since the tri-fold and not one company.

The rest of the info on the MateBook Fold Ultimate Design can obviously be found in any press release. The device packs 32GB of RAM and 2TB of storage – overkill by tablet or laptop standards. A fingerprint reader comes built into the power button, and yes, even though there isn’t a primary camera, the bezel hides a webcam that can be used the way you would on a laptop.

It’s difficult to really say who this foldable laptop is for. It oozes so much style that I find myself only being able to recommend it to people who like flexing expensive gear, like a Rolex or a Lamborghini. At $3,300 USD, it’s definitely in that territory. For people who splurged on the tri-fold Mate XT, this might just be the best laptop to complement it. After all, integration should be absolutely seamless, given that they both run the same OS too.

The post Huawei’s Foldable Laptop Is A Game-Changer And We Tried It Out: Hands-On at BEYOND Expo 2025 first appeared on Yanko Design.

Why revisit the Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Fold in 2025? The answer lies in the rapid evolution of foldable computing. When Lenovo introduced its second-generation foldable PC last year, it represented the pinnacle of what was possible in this emerging category. The device combined a versatile 16.3-inch OLED display with robust engineering and the familiar Windows ecosystem. It set benchmarks for build quality, display technology, and adaptability that competitors would need to surpass.

Designer: Lenovo
Designer: Huawei

Fast forward to today, and the landscape has shifted dramatically. Huawei has unveiled its MateBook Fold Ultimate Design, a device that challenges our understanding of what foldable laptops can achieve. With an 18-inch display that folds to a 13-inch form factor, a chassis measuring just 7.3mm when open, and a proprietary operating system built specifically for foldable hardware, Huawei has raised the stakes considerably.

This comparison arrives at a pivotal moment for foldable computing. The category has matured beyond proof-of-concept to deliver genuinely useful productivity tools. Now that we have seen what Lenovo accomplished with the X1 Fold 2024, let us examine how Huawei’s MateBook Fold Ultimate Design responds and potentially redefines the future of portable computing.

Design Philosophy and Physical Presence

The Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Fold 2024 embodies the ThinkPad ethos of reliability and purposeful design. Its magnesium alloy frame and recycled PET woven fabric cover create a device that feels substantial and durable. The fold-flat hinge eliminates gaps when closed, protecting the display while maintaining a clean profile. At 8.6mm when open and 17.4mm when closed, the X1 Fold is not the thinnest laptop available, but its construction inspires confidence. The device weighs approximately 2.9 pounds without accessories, increasing to 4.3 pounds with the keyboard and stand attached. This weight reflects Lenovo’s prioritization of durability over absolute portability.

Huawei takes a dramatically different approach with the MateBook Fold Ultimate Design. The device measures an astonishing 7.3mm when open and 14.9mm when closed, making it significantly thinner than the X1 Fold. At just 1.16kg (2.56 pounds) for the base unit and 1.45kg with the keyboard, the MateBook Fold is remarkably light for a device with an 18-inch display. This achievement comes from Huawei’s use of carbon fiber reinforcement and a zirconium-based liquid metal hinge. The 285mm “water-drop” hinge design provides smooth folding action and increased durability, with Huawei claiming a 400% improvement in hovering torque compared to conventional designs.

The most significant physical difference between these devices becomes apparent in their approach to accessories. Lenovo requires a separate kickstand for desk use, adding bulk and complexity to the overall package. Huawei integrates a sturdy kickstand directly into the MateBook Fold, eliminating the need for additional accessories and streamlining the user experience. This built-in solution allows for more versatile positioning and reduces the number of components users need to manage.

Both devices transform between multiple modes, but their physical dimensions create distinct experiences. When folded, the X1 Fold becomes a 12-inch laptop, which many users find cramped for serious multitasking. The MateBook Fold offers a more generous 13-inch workspace in laptop mode, providing additional screen real estate for productivity tasks. This difference may seem small on paper, but it significantly impacts the practical usability of these devices in their folded configurations.

The materials chosen for each device reveal different priorities. Lenovo emphasizes sustainability with its recycled PET fabric cover and plastic-free packaging. This approach aligns with growing corporate environmental concerns and provides a tactile warmth that distinguishes the X1 Fold from typical metal-clad laptops. Huawei focuses on premium materials that enable extreme thinness, using advanced alloys and composites throughout the chassis. Both approaches result in distinctive aesthetics that will appeal to different user preferences.

Display Technology and Visual Experience

Display technology represents the heart of any foldable device, and both manufacturers have made significant investments in this critical component. The Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Fold features a 16.3-inch OLED panel with a resolution of 2560 x 2024 and a 4:3 aspect ratio. This display delivers 400 nits of brightness for standard content, increasing to 600 nits for HDR material. The panel supports DisplayHDR True Black 600 certification and Dolby Vision, covering 100% of the DCI-P3 color gamut. An anti-smudge coating helps maintain visual clarity during extended use.

Huawei pushes display technology further with the MateBook Fold Ultimate Design. Its 18-inch LTPO OLED screen boasts a resolution of 3296 x 2472, maintaining the same 4:3 aspect ratio as the Lenovo. However, the MateBook Fold achieves a peak brightness of 1600 nits, more than double that of the X1 Fold. The dual-layer LTPO technology reduces power consumption by 30% compared to standard OLED panels while supporting adaptive refresh rates from 1Hz to 120Hz. This combination of size, brightness, and efficiency creates a visual experience that surpasses the X1 Fold in nearly every measurable aspect.

Both displays exhibit a visible crease at the fold, though the severity varies. Lenovo’s hinge design minimizes the crease when the device is fully open, but it becomes more noticeable at certain viewing angles. Huawei claims its water-drop hinge reduces crease visibility, though independent verification is limited. In practical use, both creases become less distracting over time as users adapt to the form factor.

Color accuracy and visual impact favor the MateBook Fold, with its higher brightness and contrast ratio of 2,000,000:1 creating more vibrant images and videos. The X1 Fold delivers excellent color reproduction but cannot match the visual punch of Huawei’s display. For creative professionals and media consumers, this difference could be decisive when choosing between these devices.

The touch response and pen input capabilities of both displays deserve consideration. Lenovo’s display works seamlessly with the Precision Pen, offering pressure sensitivity that makes note-taking and sketching feel natural. The anti-smudge coating balances fingerprint resistance with smooth touch response. Huawei provides similar functionality, though detailed specifications about pressure sensitivity levels and palm rejection capabilities are not yet widely available. Both devices support multi-touch gestures for navigation and manipulation of on-screen elements.

The 4:3 aspect ratio on both devices proves ideal for productivity applications, providing more vertical space than typical 16:9 laptop displays. This ratio works particularly well for document editing, web browsing, and coding. When watching widescreen video content, both devices display black bars at the top and bottom, but the overall screen size still delivers an immersive viewing experience, especially on the larger MateBook Fold.

Performance and Hardware Capabilities

The performance profiles of these devices reflect their different design philosophies. Lenovo equips the ThinkPad X1 Fold with 12th Generation Intel processors, ranging from the Core i5-1230U to the Core i7-1260U vPro. These 10-core, 12-thread chips provide adequate performance for productivity tasks but represent previous-generation technology in 2025. The X1 Fold supports up to 32GB of LPDDR5 RAM and 1TB of PCIe Gen 4 SSD storage. Intel Iris Xe integrated graphics handle visual processing, delivering sufficient power for office applications but struggling with demanding creative workloads.

Huawei takes a different approach with its Kirin X90 ARM-based chipset. This custom silicon is specifically optimized for HarmonyOS and the foldable form factor. The MateBook Fold includes 32GB of RAM and offers storage options up to 2TB. While direct performance comparisons are difficult due to the different architectures, the Kirin X90 delivers responsive performance for HarmonyOS applications and benefits from tight hardware-software integration.

Thermal management represents another point of divergence. Lenovo employs a fanless design in the X1 Fold, prioritizing silent operation over sustained performance. This approach leads to thermal throttling during extended workloads, limiting the device’s capabilities for processor-intensive tasks. Huawei incorporates a vapor chamber cooling system with diamond aluminum dual fans in the MateBook Fold, enabling 28W sustained performance without excessive heat or noise. This advanced cooling solution allows the MateBook Fold to maintain peak performance during demanding tasks, despite its thinner profile.

Battery life reflects both hardware choices and software optimization. The X1 Fold includes a dual-battery design totaling 64Wh, delivering approximately 8 hours and 51 minutes in laptop mode and 7 hours and 27 minutes in tablet mode under real-world conditions. The MateBook Fold features a larger 74.69Wh battery, and its LTPO display technology reduces power consumption significantly. While independent verification of Huawei’s “all-day” battery claims is not yet available, the combination of a larger battery and more efficient display technology suggests the MateBook Fold should offer superior battery life in comparable usage scenarios.

The storage subsystems in both devices utilize high-speed solid-state technology, but with different implementations. Lenovo’s PCIe Gen 4 SSD delivers sequential read speeds up to 5,000MB/s, providing quick access to large files and rapid application loading. Huawei has not published detailed storage performance metrics, but contemporary flagship devices typically feature similar high-performance storage solutions. Both devices offer sufficient storage capacity for professional workloads, with options ranging from 256GB to 2TB depending on configuration.

Memory configurations play a crucial role in multitasking performance. Both devices offer 32GB in their top configurations, which provides ample headroom for demanding productivity workflows. Neither device allows for user-upgradable memory, as both use soldered RAM to maintain their slim profiles. This limitation means buyers must carefully consider their memory needs at purchase, as future upgrades are not possible.

Operating Systems and Software Experience

The most fundamental difference between these devices lies in their operating systems. The Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Fold runs Windows 11 Pro, providing access to the vast Windows software ecosystem and familiar productivity tools. Windows offers broad compatibility with business applications and enterprise management systems, making the X1 Fold a natural choice for corporate environments. However, Windows 11 still struggles with optimization for foldable form factors. Mode switching can be inconsistent, and the operating system sometimes fails to properly scale applications when transitioning between configurations.

Huawei’s MateBook Fold runs HarmonyOS 5, a proprietary operating system designed specifically for the company’s ecosystem of devices. HarmonyOS offers several advantages for foldable hardware, including faster boot times, more efficient resource management, and seamless integration with other Huawei products. The operating system includes AI-powered features like document summarization, real-time translation, and context-aware suggestions through the Xiaoyi assistant. HarmonyOS also enables advanced multi-device collaboration, allowing users to transfer running apps between Huawei phones, tablets, and the MateBook Fold without interruption.

The software ecosystem represents a significant consideration for potential buyers. Windows provides access to millions of applications, including industry-standard productivity, creative, and development tools. HarmonyOS currently offers over 1,000 optimized applications, with projections for 2,000+ by the end of 2025. While this number is growing rapidly, it remains a fraction of what Windows provides. Additionally, HarmonyOS and its app ecosystem are primarily focused on the Chinese market, limiting its appeal for international users.

Security features differ between the platforms as well. Lenovo includes its ThinkShield security suite, Windows Hello facial recognition, and optional Computer Vision human-presence detection for privacy and security. Huawei implements its StarShield architecture, which provides security at the kernel level and throughout the operating system stack. Both approaches offer robust protection, but organizations with established Windows security protocols may prefer Lenovo’s more familiar implementation.

The multitasking capabilities of each operating system deserve special attention for foldable devices. Windows 11 includes Snap Layouts and multiple virtual desktops, which work well on the X1 Fold’s large unfolded display. However, the interface can become cluttered in laptop mode due to the reduced screen size. HarmonyOS 5 features a multitasking system specifically designed for foldable displays, with intuitive gestures for splitting the screen, floating windows, and quick app switching. This optimization creates a more cohesive experience when transitioning between different device configurations.

Software updates and long-term support policies differ significantly between these platforms. Windows 11 receives regular security updates and feature enhancements from Microsoft, with a well-established support lifecycle. HarmonyOS is newer, with less predictable update patterns, though Huawei has committed to regular improvements. For business users planning multi-year deployments, Windows offers more certainty regarding future compatibility and security maintenance.

Keyboard, Input, and Accessory Integration

The keyboard experience significantly impacts productivity on foldable devices, and both manufacturers take different approaches to this challenge. Lenovo offers the ThinkPad Bluetooth TrackPoint Keyboard Folio as an optional accessory. This keyboard maintains the classic ThinkPad feel with good key travel and includes the iconic red TrackPoint nub. However, the keyboard feels cramped compared to standard ThinkPad models, and the haptic touchpad is smaller than ideal for extended use. The keyboard attaches magnetically to the lower half of the folded display but adds 1.38 pounds to the overall weight.

Huawei includes a 5mm wireless aluminum keyboard with the MateBook Fold. This ultra-thin keyboard offers 1.5mm of key travel and a responsive touchpad. Weighing just 0.64 pounds, it adds minimal bulk to the package while providing a comfortable typing experience. The keyboard connects wirelessly and can be positioned flexibly, allowing users to create a more ergonomic workspace than the fixed position of Lenovo’s solution.

Stylus support is available on both devices, with Lenovo offering the Precision Pen for note-taking and drawing. The X1 Fold’s pen attaches magnetically to the display, ensuring it remains available when needed. Huawei provides similar stylus functionality, though detailed specifications for its pen accessory are limited in current documentation.

The most significant accessory difference is the kickstand implementation. Lenovo requires a separate adjustable-angle kickstand for desk use, adding another component to manage and transport. Huawei integrates the kickstand directly into the MateBook Fold, providing immediate stability without additional accessories. This integrated approach streamlines the user experience and reduces setup time when transitioning between usage modes.

Virtual keyboard implementations provide another input option when physical keyboards are impractical. Both devices can display touch keyboards on the lower portion of the folded screen, creating a laptop-like experience without additional hardware. Lenovo’s implementation relies on Windows 11’s touch keyboard, which offers reasonable accuracy but lacks haptic feedback. Huawei’s virtual keyboard is deeply integrated with HarmonyOS, providing customizable layouts and adaptive suggestions based on user behavior. Neither virtual keyboard fully replaces a physical keyboard for extended typing sessions, but both provide convenient input options for quick tasks.

The accessory ecosystem extends beyond keyboards and styluses. Lenovo leverages the ThinkPad’s business heritage with a range of compatible docks, cases, and adapters designed for professional use. Huawei focuses on cross-device accessories that work across its product line, creating a cohesive ecosystem for users invested in multiple Huawei products. This difference reflects the broader positioning of each brand, with Lenovo targeting enterprise customers and Huawei pursuing ecosystem-driven consumer experiences.

Connectivity and Expansion Options

Connectivity options reflect the different priorities of these manufacturers. The Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Fold includes two Thunderbolt 4 ports and one USB-C 3.2 Gen 2 port, providing versatile connectivity for peripherals and external displays. The device supports Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2, with optional LTE/5G connectivity for truly mobile productivity. This cellular option represents a significant advantage for professionals who need reliable internet access regardless of Wi-Fi availability.

The Huawei MateBook Fold offers two USB-C ports, Wi-Fi 6, and Bluetooth 5.2. The device does not include cellular connectivity options, limiting its independence from Wi-Fi networks. The reduced port selection compared to the X1 Fold may require additional adapters for users with multiple peripherals or specialized equipment.

Audio capabilities favor the MateBook Fold, which includes six speakers compared to the X1 Fold’s three. Both devices feature four-array microphones for clear voice capture during video conferences. Camera quality is superior on the MateBook Fold, with an 8MP sensor versus the 5MP camera on the X1 Fold. These differences impact the multimedia experience, particularly for users who frequently participate in video calls or consume media content.

External display support varies between the devices. Lenovo’s Thunderbolt 4 ports enable connection to multiple high-resolution monitors, supporting sophisticated desktop setups when needed. Huawei’s USB-C ports provide display output capabilities, but with potentially fewer options for multi-monitor configurations. For professionals who regularly connect to external displays, projectors, or specialized peripherals, these connectivity differences could significantly impact workflow efficiency.

Wireless connectivity standards influence performance in different environments. The X1 Fold’s Wi-Fi 6E support provides access to the less congested 6GHz band, potentially delivering faster and more reliable connections in crowded wireless environments. The MateBook Fold’s Wi-Fi 6 implementation is still capable but lacks access to these additional frequency bands. For users in dense office environments or congested urban areas, this difference could affect day-to-day connectivity performance.

Future expansion capabilities depend largely on the port selection and standards support. Thunderbolt 4 provides the X1 Fold with a forward-looking connectivity standard that supports a wide range of current and upcoming peripherals. The MateBook Fold’s standard USB-C implementation offers good compatibility but lacks some of the advanced features and bandwidth of Thunderbolt. This distinction may become more relevant as users add peripherals and accessories over the device’s lifespan.

Price, Availability, and Value Proposition

The value equation for these devices involves balancing innovation, performance, and accessibility. The Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Fold starts at $2,499 for the base configuration with a Core i5 processor, 16GB of RAM, and 256GB of storage. Fully equipped models with Core i7 processors, 32GB of RAM, and 1TB of storage approach $3,900. These prices typically do not include the keyboard and kickstand accessories, which add approximately $250-300 to the total cost.

The Huawei MateBook Fold Ultimate Design is priced between CNY 24,000 and 27,000 (approximately $3,300 to $3,700) depending on configuration. This pricing includes the wireless keyboard, making the total package cost comparable to a fully equipped X1 Fold with accessories. However, the MateBook Fold is currently available only in China, with no announced plans for international release. This limited availability significantly restricts its potential market impact outside of Asia.

Global support and service represent another consideration. Lenovo maintains service centers worldwide, providing reliable support for business travelers and international organizations. Huawei’s support network is more limited outside of China, potentially creating challenges for users who experience hardware issues in regions without official service options.

The target audience for each device influences its value proposition. The X1 Fold appeals to business professionals who prioritize Windows compatibility, global support, and integration with existing enterprise systems. Its ThinkPad branding carries significant weight in corporate environments, where reliability and security take precedence over cutting-edge specifications. The MateBook Fold targets technology enthusiasts and creative professionals who value display quality, design innovation, and ecosystem integration. Its limited availability and HarmonyOS platform make it less suitable for mainstream business adoption but potentially more appealing to users seeking the absolute latest in hardware engineering.

Financing options and business leasing programs further differentiate these devices in the market. Lenovo offers established enterprise leasing programs that allow organizations to deploy the X1 Fold without significant upfront capital expenditure. These programs typically include service agreements and upgrade paths that align with corporate refresh cycles. Huawei’s business services are less developed outside of China, potentially limiting financing options for international customers interested in the MateBook Fold.

Conclusion: The Future of Foldable Computing

The Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Fold 2024 and Huawei MateBook Fold Ultimate Design represent two distinct visions for the future of foldable computing. Lenovo prioritizes durability, Windows compatibility, and global accessibility, creating a device that fits seamlessly into existing business environments. Huawei pushes the boundaries of hardware engineering, delivering a thinner, lighter device with a larger display and custom operating system optimized for the foldable form factor.

For business users who require Windows compatibility and global support, the X1 Fold remains the more practical choice despite its thicker profile and aging processors. Its proven durability and enterprise-friendly features make it a safer investment for organizations deploying foldable technology. The device excels in versatility, allowing users to switch between tablet, laptop, and desktop modes with minimal compromise.

Creative professionals and early adopters who prioritize display quality and cutting-edge design may find the MateBook Fold more appealing, provided they can access it in their region and adapt to HarmonyOS. The larger, brighter display and thinner profile create a more futuristic experience, though the limited software ecosystem and regional availability present significant barriers to widespread adoption.

Looking forward, both devices point toward necessary improvements in the next generation of foldable computers. Future models should incorporate the latest processors with AI acceleration, reduce weight without sacrificing durability, integrate kickstands directly into the chassis, and provide larger, more comfortable keyboards. Display technology should continue to advance, with higher refresh rates, improved crease durability, and enhanced power efficiency. Software must evolve to better support the unique capabilities of foldable hardware, with more intuitive mode switching and optimized multitasking.

The competition between Lenovo and Huawei benefits consumers by accelerating innovation and highlighting different approaches to solving the challenges of foldable computing. As these technologies mature and prices eventually decrease, foldable devices will transition from executive status symbols to practical tools for a broader range of users. The X1 Fold and MateBook Fold represent important steps in this evolution, each contributing valuable lessons that will shape the next generation of flexible computing devices.

The ideal foldable device would combine Huawei’s hardware innovations with Lenovo’s software compatibility and global support. It would feature the thinness and display quality of the MateBook Fold, the enterprise security and connectivity options of the X1 Fold, and an operating system that seamlessly adapts to different usage modes. While neither current device achieves this perfect balance, both demonstrate remarkable engineering achievements that push the boundaries of what portable computers can be.

As we look to the future, the success of foldable computing will depend not just on hardware specifications but on the development of software experiences that truly leverage the unique capabilities of these flexible displays. The device that ultimately dominates this category will be the one that most effectively bridges the gap between technical innovation and practical utility, creating experiences that simply aren’t possible on conventional laptops or tablets. Both Lenovo and Huawei have taken significant steps toward this goal, and their ongoing competition promises to accelerate progress toward truly transformative foldable computers.

The post Folding the Future: Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Fold 2024 vs. Huawei MateBook Fold Ultimate Design first appeared on Yanko Design.

Laptops haven’t quite reached the same plug-and-play modularity as desktop PCs, but tinkerers have found ways to piece together unique machines using Raspberry Pi boards as the guts, Arduino microcontrollers for extra tricks, and 3D printing to craft custom shells. The result is a wave of personalized cyberdeck designs, each one showing off its creator’s vision of portable computing with a heavy dose of personality.

If you’ve ever dreamed of walking around with a computer straight out of a retro sci-fi movie, this DIY cyberdeck briefcase laptop is the stuff of geeky fantasies. Today’s electronic components and digital fabrication tools mean anyone with enough patience and creativity can build a custom computer that feels more like a prop from a 1970s space adventure than a modern laptop.

Designer: rawkout1337

This particular cyberdeck, known simply as Cyberdeck 1.1.0, doesn’t try to outdo the most extreme designs, but it still packs plenty of character into a briefcase-sized package. Instead of chasing the thin, minimalist look of commercial laptops, it leans into bold shapes, chunky silhouettes, and a color scheme that would have been right at home on the set of a 70s or 80s sci-fi show. You half expect to find it on the lap of a spaceship pilot or tucked under the arm of a secret agent from the future, or at least the future envisioned by the 70s and 80s.

What really sets the Cyberdeck 1.1.0 apart is the playful placement of its components. The power button, trackball, and mouse buttons all live on the upper half of the computer, right next to the compact screen. Using the trackball requires gripping the edge of the lid, while the three mouse buttons are tucked along the back edge, making you interact with the machine in a completely different, almost cinematic way.

Most of the internals are off-the-shelf parts, but there’s enough custom wiring and soldering to keep seasoned makers entertained. The mechanical keyboard is satisfyingly chunky, and the panels snap together with a satisfying click, thanks to the wonders of 3D printing. Even the handles are made from bent metal bars, giving the closed briefcase a portable, industrial vibe, perfect for a quick getaway or a dramatic reveal at a hacker meetup.

Of course, carrying a bright, boxy computer through airport security is bound to draw some second glances. But that’s half the fun: this is a laptop that refuses to blend in, embracing the spirit of DIY and cyberpunk with every detail. For makers, tinkerers, and sci-fi fans, the Cyberdeck 1.1.0 is a reminder that computers can be quirky, bold, and a little bit rebellious, just like the people who build them.

The post Cyberdeck Briefcase Laptop Channels 70s Sci-Fi for DIY Tech Lovers first appeared on Yanko Design.